Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Optimized Measurement Schedules for the Surface Code with Dropout
arXiv
Authors: Benjamin Anker, Dripto M. Debroy
Year
2025
Paper ID
36688
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
135
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recent work has shown that fabrication defects can be well-handled using a strategy relying on the mid-error-correction-cycle state. In this work we present two improvements to the original prescription. First, we quantify the impact of the choice of a more complete set of gauge operators originally proposed for the hex-grid surface code on the standard square-grid surface code, as well as a new method for excising effectively unused qubits. Second, we leverage the expressivity of the LUCI framework as an intermediate representation, using integer linear programming to find performant physical circuits from the large space of valid LUCI circuits. We show that on the d = 11 surface code at 1\%(3\%) dropout rate for qubits and couplers, these optimizations allow for a total improvement of 14.5\%(23.6\%) over 4d round of syndrome extraction using the SI1000 noise model at 0.1\% noise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recent work has shown that fabrication defects can be well-handled using a strategy relying on the mid-error-correction-cycle state.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.