Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Foundations
Comment on "Contextuality and quantum discord"
arXiv
Authors: Chellasamy Jebarathinam
Year
2025
Paper ID
36644
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
126
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In a paper, Al-Qasimi [Physics Letters A 449 (2022) 128347] proposed a criterion for contextuality of two-qubit systems extending Peres' proof of contextuality [Phys. Lett. A 151 (1990) 107]. Using this criterion, Al-Qasimi argued that certain discordant states can be contextual even if they are not entangled. Here I demonstrate that Al-Qasimi's criterion does not, in general, imply contextuality of two-qubit system. However, I point out that Al-Qasimi's criterion is related to a different notion of operational nonclassicality of discordant feature, which is inequivalent to contextuality. This nonclassicality beyond contextuality has been formalized in C. Jebarathinam and R. Srikanth [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 23 (2025) 2550037]. Identifying Al-Qasimi's criterion as demonstration of quantum correlation beyond contextuality, it then follows that Al-Qasimi's main conclusion that one cannot equate quantum correlation and discordant feature is made precise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In a paper, Al-Qasimi [Physics Letters A 449 (2022) 128347] proposed a criterion for contextuality of two-qubit systems extending Peres' proof of contextuality [Phys.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.