Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Experimental benchmark of the quantum-classical crossover in a spin ladder

arXiv
Authors: Hironori Yamaguchi, Itsuki Shimamura, Akira Matsuo, Koichi Kindo, Koji Araki, Yoshiki Iwasaki, Masayuki Hagiwara

Year

2025

Paper ID

36592

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

86

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report a spin-(1/2, 5/2) three-leg ladder realized in a radical-Mn polymer, exhibiting an antiferromagnetic transition and magnetization curves accurately described by classical mean-field theory. Although the underlying spin model intrinsically supports strong quantum fluctuations, as confirmed by quantum Monte Carlo simulations, the real system shows an anomalously complete suppression of quantum behavior. These findings provide a key experimental benchmark for the quantum-classical crossover and suggest that lattice topology can play a crucial role in tuning the balance between quantum and classical physics in strongly correlated systems.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report a spin-(1/2, 5/2) three-leg ladder realized in a radical-Mn polymer, exhibiting an antiferromagnetic transition and magnetization curves accurately described by...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36592 #69041 Multi-modes Bessel-Gaussian-Orb... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.