You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
k-Entanglement Measure for Multipartite Systems without Convex-Roof Extensions and its Evaluation
arXiv
Authors: Jie Guo, Shuyuan Yang, Jinchuan Hou, Xiaofei Qi, Kan He
Year
2025
Paper ID
36575
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
106
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Multipartite entanglement underpins quantum technologies but its study is limited by the lack of universal measures, unified frameworks, and the intractability of convex-roof extensions. We establish an axiomatic framework and introduce the first true k-entanglement measure, Ew(k,n), which satisfies all axioms, establishes k-entanglement as a multipartite quantum resource, avoids convex-roof constructions, and is efficiently computable. A universal algorithm evaluates arbitrary finite-dimensional states, with open-source software covering all partitions of four-qubit systems. Numerical tests certify k-entanglement within 200 seconds, consistent with necessary-and-sufficient criteria, tightening bounds and revealing new thresholds. This framework offers a scalable, practical tool for rigorous multipartite entanglement quantification.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Multipartite entanglement underpins quantum technologies but its study is limited by the lack of universal measures, unified frameworks, and the intractability of convex-roof...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.