Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Fundamental bound on entanglement generation between interacting Rydberg atoms

arXiv
Authors: Georgios Doultsinos, Antonis Delakouras, David Petrosyan

Year

2025

Paper ID

36526

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

75

Citations

0

Abstract

We analytically derive the fundamental lower bound for the preparation fidelity of a maximally-entangled (Bell) state of two atoms involving Rydberg-state interactions. This bound represents the minimum achievable error E geq ( 1 + π/2 ) Γ/B due to spontaneous decay Γ of the Rydberg states and their finite interaction strength B. Using quantum optimal control methods, we identify laser pulses for preparing a maximally-entangled state of a pair of atomic qubits with an error only 1\% above the derived fundamental bound.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We analytically derive the fundamental lower bound for the preparation fidelity of a maximally-entangled (Bell) state of two atoms involving Rydberg-state interactions.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36526 #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78814 Construction of isoscattering n... #78811 Autonomous Code Migration for Q... #78808 Experimental generation of asym...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-11-06 01:17:43

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.