Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

On the measurement problem in quantum mechanics: a simple proposal

arXiv
Authors: Luigi E. Picasso

Year

2025

Paper ID

36465

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

89

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Some of the problems connected with the interpretation of quantum mechanics are enumerated, in particular those related to some well known paradoxes and, above all, to the measurement process. We then show how the so called "Physics Laboratory Assumption" introduced in [1], which considers as "observables" only the self-adjoint operators corresponding to existing measuring instruments, can propose a new perspective on the aforementioned problems and can replace the wavefunction collapse postulate. [1] Luigi E. Picasso, "On the Concept of State in Quantum Mechanics: Another Way to Decoherence?" Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 (2), (2023)

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Some of the problems connected with the interpretation of quantum mechanics are enumerated, in particular those related to some well known paradoxes and, above all, to the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36465 #69036 CARVE-Q: Quantum-Proposed, Clas... #69035 A Modular Approach to Succinct ... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68989 Quantum correlations in QBism's...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.