Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

Classification using quantum kernels in a radial basis function network

arXiv
Authors: Emily Micklethwaite, Adam Lowe

Year

2025

Paper ID

36302

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Radial basis function (RBF) networks are expanded to incorporate quantum kernel functions enabling a new type of hybrid quantum-classical machine learning algorithm. Using this approach, synthetic examples are introduced which allow for proof of concept on interpolation and classification applications. Quantum kernels have primarily been applied to support vector machines (SVMs), however the quantum kernel RBF network offers potential benefit over quantum kernel based SVMs due to the RBF networks ability to perform multi-class classification natively compared to the standard implementation of the SVM.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Radial basis function (RBF) networks are expanded to incorporate quantum kernel functions enabling a new type of hybrid quantum-classical machine learning algorithm.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36302 #78828 Verifiable Sampling for Delegat... #78813 Large-Scale Benchmarking of Qua... #78775 On linearity or non-linearity i...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.