Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Bell nonlocality and entanglement in χcJ decays into baryon pair
arXiv
Authors: PengCheng Hong, RongGang Ping, WeiMin Song
Year
2025
Paper ID
36165
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
146
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a systematic analysis of Bell nonlocality and entanglement in χcJ$J=0,1,2$ decays into baryon pair$Bbar{B}$, with particular emphasis on their production via the process e^+e^- → ψ(2S) → γχcJ at BESIII. From the baryon-antibaryon spin density matrix, we construct measurable Bell observables and concurrence, revealing a striking hierarchy of quantum correlations: χc0 decays exhibit maximal violation and entanglement; χc1 decays violate Bell inequalities for θ1 in (0, π) with angle-modulated strength; we find that the Bbar{B} pair in χc2 decays is in a separable state, and no indication of Bell inequality violation is observed. We provide complete analytical results for J=0,1 and quantitative, uncertainty-aware estimations for J=2 based on experimental inputs from BESIII. These results establish the χcJ system produced via this radiative transition as a novel and promising platform for testing quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality in high-energy collisions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a systematic analysis of Bell nonlocality and entanglement in χcJJ=0,1,2 decays into baryon pairBbarB, with particular emphasis on their production via the process...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.