You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Quantum Readout Calibration Error Analysis

Precise estimation of the coupling strength between two nanomechanical modes from four Ramsey fringes

arXiv
Authors: Anh Tuan Le, Avishek Chowdhury, Hugo Ribeiro, Eva M. Weig

Year

2026

Paper ID

3613

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

58

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We experimentally determine the coupling strength between two strongly coupled nanomechanical modes using a Ramsey-inspired technique optimized for signals as short as four fringes. The method is applied to precisely probe the change of the coupling rate induced by a modification of the microwave-cavity readout field. It opens a pathway towards sensing electrostatic field fluctuations approaching single-charge resolution.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Readout Calibration & Error Analysis research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We experimentally determine the coupling strength between two strongly coupled nanomechanical modes using a Ramsey-inspired technique optimized for signals as short as four...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:2601.13415 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13415 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13415

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3613

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.