Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
The Quantum Rashomon Effect as a Failure of Gluing
arXiv
Authors: Partha Ghose
Year
2025
Paper ID
36129
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
116
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recently Szangolies has argued (in the setting of extended Wigner's-friend scenarios) that quantum theory permits "Rashomon" situations: multiple internally coherent accounts of events that cannot be combined into a single, consistent global narrative. This note explains why the Rashomon phenomenon can be understood as a failure of gluing: local descriptions over different contexts exist, but they do not admit a single global "all-perspectives-at-once" description. This is the same mathematical obstruction that underlies modern sheaf-theoretic treatments of contextuality. I then indicate why the same perspective is useful in parts of the social sciences (quantum-like modelling of cognition, judgment, and decision-making), where "context effects" can likewise be interpreted as the absence of a single joint probability space.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recently Szangolies has argued (in the setting of extended Wigner's-friend scenarios) that quantum theory permits "Rashomon" situations: multiple internally coherent accounts...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.