Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Collective behaviors of an electron gas in the mean-field regime
arXiv
Authors: Dong Hao Ou Yang
Year
2025
Paper ID
36033
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we study the momentum distribution of an electron gas in a 3-dimensional torus. The goal is to compute the occupation number of Fourier modes for some trial state obtained through random phase approximation. We obtain the mean-field analogue of momentum distribution formulas for electron gas in \[Daniel and Voskov, Phys. Rev. 120, (1960)\] in high density limit and \[Lam, Phys. Rev. 3, (1971)\] at metallic density. The analysis in the present paper is majorly based on the work \[Christiansen, Hainzl, Nam, Comm. Math. Phys. 401, (2023)\]. Our findings are related to recent results obtained independently by Benedikter, Lill and Naidu, and the analysis applies to a general class of singular potentials rather than just the Coulomb case.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we study the momentum distribution of an electron gas in a 3-dimensional torus.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.