Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

GEQIE Framework for Rapid Quantum Image Encoding

arXiv
Authors: Rafał Potempa, Michał Kordasz, Józef P. Cyran, Kamil Wereszczyński, Krzysztof Simiński

Year

2025

Paper ID

36006

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This work presents a Python framework named after the General Equation of Quantum Image Encoding (GEQIE). The framework creates the image-encoding state using a unitary gate, which can later be transpiled to target quantum backends. The benchmarking results, simulated with different noise levels, demonstrate the correctness of the already implemented encoding methods and the usability of the framework for more sophisticated research tasks based on quantum image encodings. Additionally, we present a showcase example of Cosmic Web dark-matter density snapshot encoding and high-accuracy retrieval PCC = 0.995 to demonstrate the extendability of the GEQIE framework to multidimensional data and its applicability to other fields of research.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This work presents a Python framework named after the General Equation of Quantum Image Encoding (GEQIE).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36006 #78828 Verifiable Sampling for Delegat... #78813 Large-Scale Benchmarking of Qua... #78775 On linearity or non-linearity i...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.