Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
GEQIE Framework for Rapid Quantum Image Encoding
arXiv
Authors: Rafał Potempa, Michał Kordasz, Józef P. Cyran, Kamil Wereszczyński, Krzysztof Simiński
Year
2025
Paper ID
36006
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This work presents a Python framework named after the General Equation of Quantum Image Encoding (GEQIE). The framework creates the image-encoding state using a unitary gate, which can later be transpiled to target quantum backends. The benchmarking results, simulated with different noise levels, demonstrate the correctness of the already implemented encoding methods and the usability of the framework for more sophisticated research tasks based on quantum image encodings. Additionally, we present a showcase example of Cosmic Web dark-matter density snapshot encoding and high-accuracy retrieval PCC = 0.995 to demonstrate the extendability of the GEQIE framework to multidimensional data and its applicability to other fields of research.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This work presents a Python framework named after the General Equation of Quantum Image Encoding (GEQIE).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.