Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Proposal for erasure conversion in integer fluxonium qubits
arXiv
Authors: Jiakai Wang, Raymond A. Mencia, Vladimir E. Manucharyan, Maxim G. Vavilov
Year
2026
Paper ID
35899
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose an erasure conversion scheme on the |erangle-|frangle and |grangle-|frangle qubits in integer fluxonium qubits (IFQs), which are both first-order insensitive to 1/f flux noise. The |erangle-|frangle transition is identical to that of a usual fluxonium qubit and hence is expected to have excellent coherence time, while the |grangle-|frangle transition is additionally protected from the energy relaxation by the parity symmetry. The dominant error in both qubits arises due to the energy relaxation: from |erangle to |grangle in the e--f qubit and from |frangle to |erangle in the g--f qubit. Such errors can be treated as erasure events, and their efficient detection improves the performance of quantum error-correcting codes. We consider a protocol for such erasure conversion based on the dispersive readout. Our main finding is that, with proper circuit parameter choice, carefully designed gate sets, and the integration of erasure conversion, IFQs promise high effective coherence times.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose an erasure conversion scheme on the |erangle-|frangle and |grangle-|frangle qubits in integer fluxonium qubits (IFQs), which are both first-order insensitive to 1/f...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.