Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Thermodynamics
Quantum Chemistry
The non-uniform electron gas
arXiv
Authors: Mihaly A. Csirik, Andre Laestadius
Year
2026
Paper ID
35893
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The non-uniform (or inhomogeneous) electron gas has received much attention in many-body quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry in the early days of density functional theory, mainly as a theoretical device to construct gradient approximations via linear response theory. In this article, motivated by the recent works of Lewin, Lieb and Seiringer, we propose a definition of the quantum (resp. classical) non-uniform electron gas through the use of the grand-canonical Levy-Lieb functional (resp. the grand-canonical strictly correlated electrons functional), establish these systems as rigorous thermodynamic limits and analyze their basic properties. The non-uniformity of the gas comes from an arbitrary lattice-periodic background density.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The non-uniform (or inhomogeneous) electron gas has received much attention in many-body quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry in the early days of density functional theory...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.