Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Precision spectroscopy of a trapped 173Yb^+ ion using a bath of ultracold atoms

arXiv
Authors: Egor Kovlakov, Rene Gerritsma

Year

2026

Paper ID

35889

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

130

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We demonstrate precision laser spectroscopy of a trapped 173Yb^+ ion that is not directly laser cooled by coupling it to ultracold atoms. The atomic bath continuously cools the internal degrees of freedom of the ion to its hyperfine ground state via spin-exchange collisions. Successful laser excitation is detected via state-selective charge transfer and subsequent ion loss. We probe the 62S1/2→ 62P3/2 transition at 329 nm and measure the magnetic and electric hyperfine interaction constants for the 62P3/2 state to be A=-241(1) MHz and B=1460(8) MHz, respectively. Our results are in agreement with a previous measurement obtained in a hollow-cathode discharge experiment but are a factor of 6-9 more precise. The techniques demonstrated in this work may be extended to perform precision spectroscopy on other ions with complex level structures.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We demonstrate precision laser spectroscopy of a trapped ^173Yb^+ ion that is not directly laser cooled by coupling it to ultracold atoms.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #35889

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.