Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Memory-Nonlinearity Trade-off across Quantum Reservoir Computing Frameworks
arXiv
Authors: Saud Čindrak, Lara Giebeler, Niclas Götting, Christopher Gies, Kathy Lüdge
Year
2026
Paper ID
35884
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
127
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) harnesses driven quantum dynamics for time-series processing, yet the mechanisms behind the differing performance levels across its many implementations remain unclear. We show that apparently unrelated approaches-including memory restriction, weak measurements, operation near the edge of quantum chaos, and dissipative dynamics-are in fact governed by the same underlying principle, namely a tunable balance between memory retention and nonlinear response. Using the information processing capacity, a dynamical measure from nonlinear systems theory, we place these behaviors in a unified framework and identify the regimes in which quantum reservoirs surpass the standard protocol. Our results reveal a fundamental connection between memory and nonlinear response. This provides a general design principle for enhanced information processing and enables systematic analysis and optimization inspired by classical dynamical quantifiers.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) harnesses driven quantum dynamics for time-series processing, yet the mechanisms behind the differing performance levels across its many...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.