Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Model selection in hybrid quantum neural networks with applications to quantum transformer architectures
arXiv
Authors: Harsh Wadhwa, Rahul Bhowmick, Naipunnya Raj, Rajiv Sangle, Ruchira V. Bhat, Krishnakumar Sabapathy
Year
2026
Paper ID
35866
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum machine learning models generally lack principled design guidelines, often requiring full resource-intensive training across numerous choices of encodings, quantum circuit designs and initialization strategies to find effective configuration. To address this challenge, we develope the Quantum Bias-Expressivity Toolbox $texttt{QBET}$, a framework for evaluating quantum, classical, and hybrid transformer architectures. In this toolbox, we introduce lean metrics for Simplicity Bias $texttt{SB}$ and Expressivity $texttt{EXP}$, for comparing across various models, and extend the analysis of texttt{SB} to generative and multiclass-classification tasks. We show that texttt{QBET} enables efficient pre-screening of promising model variants obviating the need to execute complete training pipelines. In evaluations on transformer-based classification and generative tasks we employ a total of 18 qubits for embeddings (6 qubits each for query, key, and value). We identify scenarios in which quantum self-attention variants surpass their classical counterparts by ranking the respective models according to the texttt{SB} metric and comparing their relative performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum machine learning models generally lack principled design guidelines, often requiring full resource-intensive training across numerous choices of encodings, quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.