Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
The color code, the surface code, and the transversal CNOT: NP-hardness of minimum-weight decoding
arXiv
Authors: Shouzhen Gu, Lily Wang, Aleksander Kubica
Year
2026
Paper ID
35849
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
106
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The decoding problem is a ubiquitous algorithmic task in fault-tolerant quantum computing, and solving it efficiently is essential for scalable quantum computing. Here, we prove that minimum-weight decoding is NP-hard in three quintessential settings: (i) the color code with Pauli Z errors, (ii) the surface code with Pauli X, Y and Z errors, and (iii) the surface code with a transversal CNOT gate, Pauli Z and measurement bit-flip errors. Our results show that computational intractability already arises in basic and practically relevant decoding problems central to both quantum memories and logical circuit implementations, highlighting a sharp computational complexity separation between minimum-weight decoding and its approximate realizations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The decoding problem is a ubiquitous algorithmic task in fault-tolerant quantum computing, and solving it efficiently is essential for scalable quantum computing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.