Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Post-selective attack with multi-mode projection onto Fock subspace

arXiv
Authors: Andrei Gaidash, George Miroshnichenko, Anton Kozubov

Year

2026

Paper ID

35846

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

117

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work we present a comprehensive analysis of a post-selective attack on quantum key distribution protocols employing phase-encoded linearly independent coherent states (or similar alternatives). The attack relies on multimode projection onto a Fock subspace and enables probabilistic extraction of information by an eavesdropper. We derive analytical expressions for the information accessible to the adversary and show that it depends only on three protocol parameters: the mean photon number of the signal states, the phase separation in the information basis, and the expected optical loss of the quantum channel. Several optical realizations of phase-encoded quantum key distribution protocols are analyzed to illustrate the applicability of the results. Possible countermeasures against the proposed attack are also discussed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work we present a comprehensive analysis of a post-selective attack on quantum key distribution protocols employing phase-encoded linearly independent coherent states...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #35846

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.