Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Precision's arrow of time
arXiv
Authors: Luis E. F. Foa Torres, G. Pappas, V. Achilleos, D. Bautista Avilés
Year
2026
Paper ID
35832
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
100
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The arrow of time is usually attributed to two mechanisms: decoherence through environmental entanglement, and chaos through nonlinear dynamics. Here we demonstrate a third route, Precision-Induced Irreversibility (PIR), requiring neither. No entanglement. No nonlinearity. Just three ingredients: amplification, non-normality, and finite dynamic range, whose interplay yields an operational arrow of time; remove any one and reversibility can be restored. Non-Hermitian evolution remains mathematically invertible, yet beyond a sharp temporal predictability horizon scaling linearly with available precision, distinct states collapse onto identical representations. Echo-fidelity tests confirm this transition across arbitrary-precision calculations and hardware, revealing where formal invertibility and physical reversibility diverge.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The arrow of time is usually attributed to two mechanisms: decoherence through environmental entanglement, and chaos through nonlinear dynamics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.