Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Casimir Geometry as a Probe of Short Range Forces

arXiv

Authors: Xiaolin Ma, Volodymyr Takhistov, Hideo Iizuka

Year

2026

Paper ID

35828

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Casimir force searches provide among the most sensitive laboratory probes of new short range interactions. Existing constraints rely almost exclusively on a single geometry. We show that Casimir geometry constitutes an independent observable, as Yukawa-type interactions and Casimir background exhibit different geometric scaling for bulk forces and surface quantum effects. We derive the first constraints from sphere-sphere and plate-plate geometries, thereby completing the canonical set of Casimir geometries, obtaining the most stringent Casimir-based bounds for λlesssim 10^-8 m. Our results establish geometry as a new handle for systematic searches for short range forces.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Casimir force searches provide among the most sensitive laboratory probes of new short range interactions.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:2603.22413 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22413 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22413

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.