Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
In-orbit Test of the Weak Equivalence Principle with Atom Interferometry
arXiv
Authors: Dan-Fang Zhang, Jing-Ting Li, Wen-Zhang Wang, Wei-Hao Xu, Jia-Yi Wei, Xiao Li, Yi-Bo Wang, Dong-Feng Gao, Jia-Qi Zhong, Biao Tang, Lin Zhou, Run-Bing Li, Huan-Yao Sun, Qun-Feng Chen, Lei Qin, Mei-zhen An, Zong-Feng Li, Shu-Quan Wang, Xiao-Xiao Guo, Yao Tian, Xi-He Yu, Hong-En Zhong, Xi Chen, Jin Wang, Ming-Sheng Zhan
Year
2026
Paper ID
35801
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) is a central pillar of general relativity. Its precise test with quantum systems in space offers a unique window onto new physics. Here we report the first in-orbit quantum test of the WEP. A dual-species (85Rb/87Rb) atom interferometer is realized aboard the China Space Station. Methods of platform motion suppression, fluorescence detection switching, and two-photon detuning switching are developed to eliminate phase noise and improve measurement accuracy. A test uncertainty of 2.8*10-8 is obtained from 280 days of WEP test data, and a test result of (-3.1+/-4.6)*10-7 is achieved after error estimation. This improves prior atom-interferometric WEP tests in microgravity by three orders of magnitude. This work paves the way for space-borne quantum inertial sensors and their application to future fundamental physics in space.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) is a central pillar of general relativity.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.