Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
A multi-ion optical clock with mathbf{5 times 10-19} uncertainty
arXiv
Authors: Melina Filzinger, Martin R. Steinel, Jian Jiang, Daniel Bennett, Tanja E. Mehlstäubler, Ekkehard Peik, Nils Huntemann
Year
2026
Paper ID
35773
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Today's most accurate clocks are based on laser spectroscopy of electronic transitions in single trapped ions and feature fractional frequency uncertainties below 1times10-18. Scaling these systems to multiple, simultaneously interrogated ions reduces measurement times, driving recent advances in multi-ion clocks. However, maintaining state-of-the-art systematic uncertainties while increasing the number of ions remains a central challenge. Here, we report on a multi-ion optical atomic clock with a fractional frequency uncertainty of 5.3times10-19 and up to 10 \Sr ions. Ion-resolved state detection enables minimization of position-dependent shifts, with residual effects suppressed below the 10-20-level. Clock operation with eight to ten ions reduces the measurement time by a factor of 4.8 compared to single-ion operation. A comparison with an established \Yb single-ion clock yields an unperturbed frequency ratio of 0.6926711632159660405(20), with a statistical uncertainty of 0.9times10-18 and a combined uncertainty of 2.9times 10-18. These results demonstrate robust multi-ion clock operation with reduced averaging time and state-of-the-art accuracy.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Today's most accurate clocks are based on laser spectroscopy of electronic transitions in single trapped ions and feature fractional frequency uncertainties below 1times10^-18.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.