Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Reaching for the performance limit of hybrid density functional theory for molecular chemistry
arXiv
Authors: Jiashu Liang, Martin Head-Gordon
Year
2026
Paper ID
35772
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) offers an exceptional balance between accuracy and efficiency, but practical density functional approximations face an unavoidable trade-off among simplicity, accuracy, and transferability. A systematic protocol is therefore needed to develop functionals that are reliably most accurate within a chosen application domain. Here we present such a protocol by combining constraint enforcement, flexible functional forms, and modern optimization. Applying this strategy to the range-separated hybrid (RSH) meta-GGA framework, we obtain the carefully optimized and appropriately constrained hybrid (COACH) functional. Across broad molecular benchmarks, COACH improves both accuracy and transferability relative to leading RSH meta-GGAs, including \omegaB97M-V, while retaining the computational practicality of its rung. Finally, our analysis of the remaining trade-offs and saturation behavior suggests that further systematic progress will likely require the incorporation of genuinely nonlocal information.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Density functional theory (DFT) offers an exceptional balance between accuracy and efficiency, but practical density functional approximations face an unavoidable trade-off...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.