Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Test of the essential collapse-locality loophole
arXiv
Authors: Mónica Agüero, Juliana Bourdieu, Alejandro Hnilo, Marcelo Kovalsky, Myriam Nonaka
Year
2026
Paper ID
35681
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
150
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Collapse-locality is an untested loophole in the violation of Bell's inequalities. The core of the argument is that the time value of photon detection is delayed by the time Tc required by the collapse of its quantum state. The value of Tc is given by the underlying theory of quantum collapse, and is mostly unknown. Depending on the value of Tc, detections in the performed Bell's experiments may have not been truly space-like separated events. This implies that the inequalities may have been violated as a consequence of (conspiratorial) information propagating at subluminal speed. We report an optical Bell experiment which closes the weaker ('essential') form of this loophole regardless the theory of quantum collapse. This is possible thanks to unique features of the setup. These features are: classical signals sent to the stations to define a time reference, and variable distance between the stations leaving all other parameters constant.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Collapse-locality is an untested loophole in the violation of Bell's inequalities.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.