Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Adaptive Negativity Estimation via Collective Measurements
arXiv
Authors: Martin Zeman, Vojtěch Trávníček, Antonín Černoch, Jan Soubusta, Karel Lemr
Year
2026
Paper ID
35642
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
98
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper explores an efficient method for entanglement quantification in two-qubit and qubit-qutrit quantum systems based upon the framework of collective measurements in conjunction with machine learning. We introduce an adaptive measurement procedure in which measurement settings are dynamically adjusted based on prior measurement outcomes aiming to optimize the inference precision given a limited number of these measurement settings. The procedure makes use of the Long Short-Term Memory networks to recurrently process collective measurements on two copies of the investigated states. Obtained results demonstrate the tangible benefits of the adaptive measurements in comparison to previously described non-adaptive strategies.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper explores an efficient method for entanglement quantification in two-qubit and qubit-qutrit quantum systems based upon the framework of collective measurements in...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.