Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

Adaptive Negativity Estimation via Collective Measurements

arXiv
Authors: Martin Zeman, Vojtěch Trávníček, Antonín Černoch, Jan Soubusta, Karel Lemr

Year

2026

Paper ID

35642

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

98

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This paper explores an efficient method for entanglement quantification in two-qubit and qubit-qutrit quantum systems based upon the framework of collective measurements in conjunction with machine learning. We introduce an adaptive measurement procedure in which measurement settings are dynamically adjusted based on prior measurement outcomes aiming to optimize the inference precision given a limited number of these measurement settings. The procedure makes use of the Long Short-Term Memory networks to recurrently process collective measurements on two copies of the investigated states. Obtained results demonstrate the tangible benefits of the adaptive measurements in comparison to previously described non-adaptive strategies.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This paper explores an efficient method for entanglement quantification in two-qubit and qubit-qutrit quantum systems based upon the framework of collective measurements in...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #35642 #78828 Verifiable Sampling for Delegat... #78813 Large-Scale Benchmarking of Qua... #78775 On linearity or non-linearity i...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.