Quick Navigation
Topics
Benchmarking Verification Validation
Quantum Experiment Design Methodology
Device-independent quantum memory certification in two-point measurement experiments
arXiv
Authors: Leonardo S. V. Santos, Peter Tirler, Michael Meth, Lukas Gerster, Manuel John, Keshav Pareek, Tim Gollerthan, Martin Ringbauer, Otfried Gühne
Year
2026
Paper ID
3561
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
151
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum memories are key components of emerging quantum technologies. They are designed to store quantum states and retrieve them on demand without losing features such as superposition and entanglement. Verifying that a memory preserves these features is indispensable for applications such as quantum computation, cryptography and networks, yet no general and assumption-free method has been available. Here, we present a device-independent approach for certifying black-box quantum memories, requiring no trust in any part of the experimental setup. We do so by probing quantum systems at two points in time and then confronting the observed temporal correlations against classical causal models through violations of causal inequalities. We perform a proof-of-principle experiment in a trapped-ion quantum processor, where we certify 35 ms of a qubit memory. Our method establishes temporal correlations and causal modelling as practical and powerful tool for benchmarking key ingredients of quantum technologies, such as quantum gates or implementations of algorithms.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Benchmarking, Verification & Validation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum memories are key components of emerging quantum technologies.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.