Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Influence of Pumping Regime on Temperature Resolution in Nanothermometry
DOAJ
Authors: Jonas Thiem, Axel Ruehl, Detlev Ristau
Year
2021
Paper ID
35603
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
199
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In recent years, optical nanothermometers have seen huge improvements in terms of precision as well as versatility, and several research efforts have been directed at adapting novel active materials or further optimizing the temperature sensitivity. The signal-to-noise ratio of the emission lines is commonly seen as the only limitation regarding high precision measurements. The role of re-absorption caused by a population of lower energy levels, however, has so far been neglected as a potential bottleneck for both high resolution and material selection. In this work, we conduct a study of the time dependent evolution of population densities in different luminescence nanothermometer classes under the commonly used pulsed excitation scheme. It is shown that the population of lower energy levels varies when the pump source fluctuates in terms of power and pulse duration. This leads to a significant degradation in temperature resolution, with limiting values of 0.5 K for common systems. Our study on the error margin indicates that either short pulsed or continuous excitation should be preferred for high precision measurements. Additionally, we derive conversion factors, enabling the re-calibration of currently available intensity ratio measurements to the steady state regime, thus facilitating the transition from pulse regimes to continuous excitation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In recent years, optical nanothermometers have seen huge improvements in terms of precision as well as versatility, and several research efforts have been directed at adapting...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.