Quick Navigation
Topics
Benchmarking Verification Validation
A comparison of HPC-based quantum computing simulators using Quantum Volume
arXiv
Authors: Lourens van Niekerk, Dhiraj Kumar, Aasish Kumar Sharma, Tino Meisel, Martin Leandro Paleico, Christian Boehme
Year
2024
Paper ID
352
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper compares quantum computing simulators running on a single CPU or GPU-based HPC node using the Quantum Volume benchmark commonly proposed for comparing NISQ systems. As simulators do not suffer from noise, the metric used in the comparison is the time required to simulate a set Quantum Volume. The results are important to estimate the feasibility of proof of concept studies and debugging of quantum algorithms on HPC systems. Besides benchmarks of some commonly used simulators, this paper also offers an overview of their main features, a review of the state of quantum computing simulation and quantum computing benchmarking, and some insight into the theory of Quantum Volume.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Benchmarking, Verification & Validation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper compares quantum computing simulators running on a single CPU or GPU-based HPC node using the Quantum Volume benchmark commonly proposed for comparing NISQ systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.