Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering
Exploring Quantumness at Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiments
arXiv
Authors: Murshed Alam, Vedran Brdar, Dibya S. Chattopadhyay
Year
2026
Paper ID
3505
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Violations of classicality can be probed through measurements performed on a system at different times, as proposed by Leggett and Garg. Specifically, violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities suggest the presence of quantum effects in macroscopic systems. Long-baseline neutrino experiments provide some of the longest available propagation distances over which such tests can be performed. Previous studies of Leggett-Garg tests in the neutrino sector have largely focused on showing that the oscillation probabilities can violate classical bounds for certain parameter choices. In this work, we develop a more complete and data-driven framework that treats both the distributions representing the classical and quantum behavior, as well as the experimental uncertainties. We consider MINOS, T2K, NOvA, as well as the upcoming DUNE, and present the respective statistical significance for distinguishing quantum behavior from classical scenarios at these long-baseline neutrino experiments. Among them, we find that T2K yields the most significant violation of classicality, at the level of sim 14 σ, with NOvA and projections for DUNE also resulting in a significance of more than 5σ.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Device Fabrication & Process Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Violations of classicality can be probed through measurements performed on a system at different times, as proposed by Leggett and Garg.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.