Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization Variational Hybrid Quantum Algorithms

Fair sampling with temperature-targeted QAOA based on quantum-classical correspondence theory

arXiv
Authors: Tetsuro Abe, Shu Tanaka

Year

2026

Paper ID

3461

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

95

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In combinatorial optimization problems with degenerate ground states, fair sampling of degenerate solutions is essential. However, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) with a standard transverse-field mixer induces biases among degenerate states as circuit depth increases. Based on quantum-classical correspondence theory, we propose SBO-QAOA, which employs a temperature-dependent Hamiltonian encoding a Gibbs distribution as its ground state. Numerical simulations show that, unlike standard QAOA, SBO-QAOA yields ground-state probabilities converging to finite-temperature values with uniform distribution among degenerate states. These fairness and temperature-targeting properties are preserved even with only four variational parameters under a linear schedule.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In combinatorial optimization problems with degenerate ground states, fair sampling of degenerate solutions is essential.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3461 #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69528 QALM: Escaping Local Minima via...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.