Quick Navigation
Topics
Benchmarking Verification Validation
Quantum Position Verification with Remote Untrusted Devices
arXiv
Authors: Gautam A. Kavuri, Yanbao Zhang, Abigail R. Gookin, Soumyadip Patra, Joshua C. Bienfang, Honghao Fu, Yusuf Alnawakhtha, Dileep V. Reddy, Michael D. Mazurek, Carlos Abellán, Waldimar Amaya, Morgan W. Mitchell, Sae Woo Nam, Carl A. Miller, Richard P. Mirin, Martin J. Stevens, Scott Glancy, Emanuel Knill, Lynden K. Shalm
Year
2026
Paper ID
3409
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
150
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Many applications require or benefit from being able to securely localize remote parties. In classical physics, adversaries can in principle have complete knowledge of such a party's devices, and secure localization is fundamentally impossible. This limitation can be overcome with quantum technologies, but proposals to date require trusting vulnerable hardware. Here we develop and experimentally demonstrate a protocol for device-independent quantum position verification that guarantees security with only observed correlations from a loophole-free Bell test across a quantum network. The protocol certifies the position of a remote party against adversaries who, before each instance of the test, are weakly entangled, but otherwise have unlimited quantum computation and communication capabilities. Our demonstration achieves a one-dimensional localization that is 2.47(2) times smaller than the best, necessarily non-remote, classical localization protocol. Compared to such a classical protocol having identical latencies, the localization is 4.53(5) times smaller. This work anchors digital security in the physical world.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Benchmarking, Verification & Validation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Many applications require or benefit from being able to securely localize remote parties.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.