Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum State Preparation Representation

From Joint to Single-System Psi-Onticity Without Preparation Independence

arXiv
Authors: Shan Gao

Year

2026

Paper ID

3385

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

113

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) theorem establishes ψ-onticity for individual quantum systems, but its standard formulation relies on the Preparation Independence Postulate (PIP). This has led to a prevalent view that rejecting PIP leaves open the possibility of ψ-epistemic models for individual systems. In this work, we show that this understanding is incomplete: once the PBR theorem establishes ψ-onticity for composite systems prepared in product states, the ψ-onticity of the individual subsystems follows directly from the tensor-product structure of quantum mechanics, without invoking PIP or any further auxiliary assumptions. This result removes a key auxiliary assumption from the PBR theorem, closes a persistent loophole for preserving ψ-epistemic models, and strengthens the conceptual foundations of ψ-ontology.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum State Preparation & Representation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) theorem establishes ψ-onticity for individual quantum systems, but its standard formulation relies on the Preparation Independence Postulate (PIP).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3385 #68971 On solutions of the Schrödinger...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.