Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Small sets of locally indistinguishable orthogonal maximally entangled states
arXiv
Authors: Alessandro Cosentino, Vincent Russo
Year
2013
Paper ID
33739
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
123
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the problem of distinguishing quantum states using local operations and classical communication (LOCC). A question of fundamental interest is whether there exist sets of k leq d orthogonal maximally entangled states in mathbb{C}dotimesmathbb{C}d that are not perfectly distinguishable by LOCC. A recent result by Yu, Duan, and Ying [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 020506 (2012) - arXiv:1107.3224 [quant-ph]] gives an affirmative answer for the case k = d. We give, for the first time, a proof that such sets of states indeed exist even in the case k < d. Our result is constructive and holds for an even wider class of operations known as positive-partial-transpose measurements (PPT). The proof uses the characterization of the PPT-distinguishability problem as a semidefinite program.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the problem of distinguishing quantum states using local operations and classical communication (LOCC).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.