Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Small sets of locally indistinguishable orthogonal maximally entangled states

arXiv
Authors: Alessandro Cosentino, Vincent Russo

Year

2013

Paper ID

33739

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

123

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the problem of distinguishing quantum states using local operations and classical communication (LOCC). A question of fundamental interest is whether there exist sets of k leq d orthogonal maximally entangled states in mathbb{C}dotimesmathbb{C}d that are not perfectly distinguishable by LOCC. A recent result by Yu, Duan, and Ying [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 020506 (2012) - arXiv:1107.3224 [quant-ph]] gives an affirmative answer for the case k = d. We give, for the first time, a proof that such sets of states indeed exist even in the case k < d. Our result is constructive and holds for an even wider class of operations known as positive-partial-transpose measurements (PPT). The proof uses the characterization of the PPT-distinguishability problem as a semidefinite program.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the problem of distinguishing quantum states using local operations and classical communication (LOCC).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #33739

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.