Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Effects of Phase Fluctuations on Phase Sensitivity and Visibility of Path-Entangled Photon Fock States

arXiv
Authors: Bhaskar Roy Bardhan, Kebei Jiang, Jonathan P. Dowling

Year

2013

Paper ID

33637

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study effects of phase fluctuations on phase sensitivity and visibility of a class of robust path-entangled photon Fock states (known as mm' states) as compared to the maximally path-entangled N00N states in presence of realistic phase fluctuations such as turbulence noise. Our results demonstrate that the mm' states, which are more robust than the N00N state against photon loss, perform equally well when subject to such fluctuations. We show that the phase sensitivity with parity detection for both of the above states saturates the quantum Cramer-Rao bound in presence of such noise, suggesting that the parity detection presents an optimal detection strategy.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study effects of phase fluctuations on phase sensitivity and visibility of a class of robust path-entangled photon Fock states (known as mm' states) as compared to the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #33637 #69028 Unified Framework for Functiona... #69026 Bures geodesics for non-faithfu... #69024 Cyclic ladder operators and hid... #69021 Nonreciprocal optomechanical en...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.