Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Goos-Hänchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts from a quantum-mechanical perspective
arXiv
Authors: Falk Töppel, Marco Ornigotti, Andrea Aiello
Year
2013
Paper ID
33564
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the classical optics effects known as Goos-Hänchen (GH) and Imbert-Fedorov (IF) shifts, occurring when reflecting a bounded light beam from a planar surface, by using a quantum-mechanical formalism. This new approach allows us to naturally separate the spatial shift into two parts, one independent on orbital angular momentum (OAM) and the other one showing OAM-induced spatial-vs-angular shift mixing. In addition, within this quantum-mechanical-like formalism, it becomes apparent that the angular shift is proportional to the beams angular spread, namely to the variance of the transverse components of the wave vector. Moreover, we extent our treatment to the enhancement of beam shifts via weak measurements and relate our results to recent experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the classical optics effects known as Goos-Hänchen (GH) and Imbert-Fedorov (IF) shifts, occurring when reflecting a bounded light beam from a planar surface, by using...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.