Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Optimal architecture for a non-deterministic noiseless linear amplifier

arXiv
Authors: N. A. McMahon, A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph

Year

2013

Paper ID

33478

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

106

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Non-deterministic quantum noiseless linear amplifiers are a new technology with interest in both fundamental understanding and new applications. With a noiseless linear amplifier it is possible to perform tasks such as improving the performance of quantum key distribution and purifying lossy channels. Previous designs for noiseless linear amplifiers involving linear optics and photon counting are non-optimal because they have a probability of success lower than the theoretical bound given by the theory of generalised quantum measurement. This paper develops a theoretical model which reaches this limit. We calculate the fidelity and probability of success of this new model for coherent states and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) entangled states.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Non-deterministic quantum noiseless linear amplifiers are a new technology with interest in both fundamental understanding and new applications.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #33478 #68472 Non-equilibirum physics of dens... #68468 Error Exponents for Quantum Pac... #68462 Quantum Speed Limit under Calib... #68459 Expanding quantum magnetic field

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.