Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

PT-symmetry and Transparency

arXiv
Authors: Zafar Ahmed

Year

2013

Paper ID

33347

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

132

Citations

N/A

Abstract

It is known that the perfect absorption of two identical waves incident on a complex potential from left and right can occur at a fixed real energy and that the time-reversed setting of this system would act as a laser at threshold at the same energy. Here, we argue and show that PT-symmetric potentials are exceptional in this regard which do not allow Coherent Perfect Absorption without lasing as the modulus of the determinant of the S-matrix, |det S|, becomes 1, for all positive energies. Next we show that in the parametric regimes where the PT-symmetry is unbroken, the eigenvalues, spm of S, can become unitary (uni-modular) for all energies. Then the potential becomes coherent perfect emitter on both sides for any energy of coherent injection. We call this property Transparency.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • It is known that the perfect absorption of two identical waves incident on a complex potential from left and right can occur at a fixed real energy and that the time-reversed...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #33347 #68472 Non-equilibirum physics of dens... #68468 Error Exponents for Quantum Pac... #68462 Quantum Speed Limit under Calib... #68459 Expanding quantum magnetic field

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.