Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Approximate level-by-level maximum-likelihood decoding based on the Chase algorithm for high-rate concatenated stabilizer codes
arXiv
Authors: Takeshi Kakizaki
Year
2026
Paper ID
3316
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
110
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC) is expected to address a wide range of computational problems. To realize large-scale FTQC, it is essential to encode logical qubits using quantum error-correcting codes. High-rate concatenated codes have recently attracted attention due to theoretical advances in fault-tolerant protocols with constant-space-overhead and polylogarithmic-time-overhead, as well as practical developments of high-rate many-hypercube codes equipped with a high-performance level-by-level minimum-distance decoder (LMDD). We propose a general, high-performance decoder for high-rate concatenated stabilizer codes that extends LMDD by leveraging the Chase algorithm to generate a suitable set of candidate errors. Our simulation results demonstrate that the proposed decoder outperforms conventional decoders for high-rate concatenated Hamming codes under bit-flip noise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC) is expected to address a wide range of computational problems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.