Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Non-existence of Taylor expansion in time due to cusps

arXiv
Authors: Zeng-hui Yang, Kieron Burke

Year

2013

Paper ID

33136

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

123

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In the usual treatment of electronic structure, all matter has cusps in the electronic density at nuclei. Cusps can produce non-analytic behavior in time, even in response to perturbations that are time-analytic. We analyze these non-analyticities in a simple case from many perspectives. We describe a method, the s-expansion, that can be used in several such cases, and illustrate it with a variety of examples. These include both the sudden appearance of electric fields and disappearance of nuclei, in both one and three dimensions. When successful, the s-expansion yields the dominant short-time behavior, no matter how strong the external electric field, but agrees with linear response theory in the weak limit. We discuss the relevance of these results to time-dependent density functional theory.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In the usual treatment of electronic structure, all matter has cusps in the electronic density at nuclei.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #33136 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.