!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Protecting Superconducting Qubits with Universal Quantum Degeneracy Point
arXiv
Authors: X. -H. Deng, Y. Hu, Lin Tian
Year
2013
Paper ID
33097
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Low-frequency noise can induce serious decoherence in superconducting qubits. Due to its diverse physical origin, such noise can couple with the qubits either as transverse or as longitudinal noise. Here, we present a universal quantum degeneracy point approach that can protect an encoded qubit from arbitrary low-frequency noise. We further show that universal quantum logic gates can be performed on the encoded qubits with high fidelity. The proposed scheme can be readily implemented with superconducting flux qubits or with a qubit coupling with a superconducting resonator. Meanwhile, the scheme is also robust against small parameter spreads due to fabrication errors in the superconducting systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Low-frequency noise can induce serious decoherence in superconducting qubits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.