Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Analytically computable tangle for three-qubit mixed states
arXiv
Authors: Hiroyasu Tajima
Year
2013
Paper ID
33067
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
142
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a new tripartite entanglement measure for three-qubit mixed states. The new measure tr(ρ), which we refer to as the r-tangle, is given as a kind of the tangle, but has a feature which the tangle does not have; if we can derive an analytical form of tr(ρ) for a three-qubit mixed state ρ, we can also derive tr(ρ') analytically for any states ρ' which are SLOCC-equivalent to the state ρ. The concurrence of two-qubit states also satisfies the feature, but the tangle does not. These facts imply that the r-tangle tr is the appropriate three-partite counterpart of the concurrence. We also derive an analytical form of the r-tangle tr for mixtures of a generalized GHZ state and a generalized W state, and hence for all states which are SLOCC-equivalent to them.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a new tripartite entanglement measure for three-qubit mixed states.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.