Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Software Tools Programming
Against probability: A quantum state is more than a list of probability distributions
arXiv
Authors: Ladina Hausmann, Renato Renner
Year
2026
Paper ID
3306
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
100
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The state ρ of a quantum system can be represented by a vector mathbf{P}_{mathcal{M}}(ρ) of outcome probabilities for a set of measurements mathcal{M}. Such representations appear throughout physics, for example, in quantum field theory via correlation functions and in quantum foundations within generalized probabilistic frameworks. In this work, we identify an unavoidable tension: to enable operationally meaningful statements, the map {ρmapsto mathbf{P}_{mathcal{M}}(ρ)} must be topologically robust unicode{x2013} preserving the notion of closeness between states. Yet, a probability representation that is topologically robust cannot simultaneously retain other essential structure, such as the subsystem structure.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Software Tools & Programming research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The state ρ of a quantum system can be represented by a vector mathbfP_mathcalM(ρ) of outcome probabilities for a set of measurements mathcalM.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.