Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Experimental Demonstration of non-Markovian Dynamics via a Temporal Bell-like Inequality
arXiv
Authors: A. M. Souza, J. Li, D. O. Soares-Pinto, R. S. Sarthour, S. Oliveira, S. F. Huelga, M. Paternostro, F. L. Semião
Year
2013
Paper ID
33050
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
95
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We assess non-Markovianity of a quantum open-system dynamics through the violation of temporal bell-like inequalities in a controllable Nuclear Magnetic Resonance system. We investigate experimentally the connections between the violation of the addressed temporal Bell-like inequality and the non-divisibility of the effective evolution of our system, which we fully characterize in a broad range of experimentally controllable regimes. Finally, we investigate the link between our approach and Leggett-Garg-like inequalities based on time-translational two-time correlation functions. These results open up interesting perspectives for the effective, non-tomographic characterization of dynamical evolution by combining tools of different nature.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We assess non-Markovianity of a quantum open-system dynamics through the violation of temporal bell-like inequalities in a controllable Nuclear Magnetic Resonance system.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.