Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Reducing intrinsic decoherence in a superconducting circuit by quantum error detection
arXiv
Authors: Y. P. Zhong, Z. L. Wang, John M. Martinis, A. N. Cleland, A. N. Korotkov, H. Wang
Year
2013
Paper ID
32966
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A fundamental challenge for quantum information processing is reducing the impact of environmentally-induced errors. Quantum error detection (QED) provides one approach to handling such errors, in which errors are rejected when they are detected. Here we demonstrate a QED protocol based on the idea of quantum un-collapsing, using this protocol to suppress energy relaxation due to the environment in a three-qubit superconducting circuit. We encode quantum information in a target qubit, and use the other two qubits to detect and reject errors caused by energy relaxation. This protocol improves the storage time of a quantum state by a factor of roughly three, at the cost of a reduced probability of success. This constitutes the first experimental demonstration of an algorithm-based improvement in the lifetime of a quantum state stored in a qubit.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A fundamental challenge for quantum information processing is reducing the impact of environmentally-induced errors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.