Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Control Electronics System Integration
Sedentary quantum walks on bipartite graphs
arXiv
Authors: Karen Meagher, Hermie Monterde
Year
2026
Paper ID
3296
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
If a quantum walk starting on a vertex tends to stay at home, then that vertex is said to be sedentary. We prove that almost all planar graphs and almost all trees contain at least two sedentary vertices for any assignment of edge weights - a result that suggests vertex sedentariness is a common phenomenon in trees and planar graphs. For weighted bipartite graphs, we show that a vertex is not sedentary whenever 0 does not belong to its eigenvalue support. Consequently, each vertex in a nonsingular weighted bipartite graph is not sedentary, a stark contrast to weighted trees and weighted planar graphs. A corollary of this result is that every vertex in a bipartite graph with a unique perfect matching is not sedentary for any assignment of edge weights. We also construct new families of weighted bipartite graphs with sedentary vertices using the bipartite double and subdivision operations. Finally, we show that unweighted paths and unweighted even cycles contain no sedentary vertices.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Control Electronics & System Integration research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- If a quantum walk starting on a vertex tends to stay at home, then that vertex is said to be sedentary.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.