Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Thermodynamics
Genuine Multipartite Entanglement in the XY Model
arXiv
Authors: S. M. Giampaolo, B. C. Hiesmayr
Year
2013
Paper ID
32925
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We analyze the XY model characterized by an anisotropy γ in an external magnetic field h with respect to its genuine multipartite entanglement content (in the thermodynamic and finite size case). Despite its simplicity we show that the quantity -detecting genuine multipartite entanglement through permutation operators and being a lower bound on measures- witnesses the presence of genuine multipartite entanglement for nearly all values of γ and h. We further show that the phase transition and scaling properties are fully characterized by this multipartite quantity. Consequently, we provide a useful toolbox for other condensed matter systems, where bipartite entanglement measures are known to fail.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We analyze the XY model characterized by an anisotropy γ in an external magnetic field h with respect to its genuine multipartite entanglement content (in the thermodynamic and...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.