Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering
High-Performance Exact Synthesis of Two-Qubit Quantum Circuits
arXiv
Authors: Andrew N. Glaudell, Michael Jarret, Swan Klein, Samuel S. Mendelson, T. C. Mooney, Mingzhen Tian
Year
2026
Paper ID
3284
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
93
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Exact synthesis provides unconditional optimality and canonical structure, but is often limited to small, carefully scoped regimes. We present an exact synthesis framework for two-qubit circuits over the Clifford+T gate set that optimizes T-count exactly. Our approach exhausts a bounded search space, exploits algebraic canonicalization to avoid redundancy, and constructs a lookup table of optimal implementations that turns synthesis into a query. Algorithmically, we combine meet-in-the-middle ideas with provable pruning rules and problem-specific arithmetic designed for modern hardware. The result is an exact, reusable synthesis engine with substantially improved practical performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Circuit Design & Gate Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Exact synthesis provides unconditional optimality and canonical structure, but is often limited to small, carefully scoped regimes.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.