Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering

High-Performance Exact Synthesis of Two-Qubit Quantum Circuits

arXiv
Authors: Andrew N. Glaudell, Michael Jarret, Swan Klein, Samuel S. Mendelson, T. C. Mooney, Mingzhen Tian

Year

2026

Paper ID

3284

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

93

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Exact synthesis provides unconditional optimality and canonical structure, but is often limited to small, carefully scoped regimes. We present an exact synthesis framework for two-qubit circuits over the Clifford+T gate set that optimizes T-count exactly. Our approach exhausts a bounded search space, exploits algebraic canonicalization to avoid redundancy, and constructs a lookup table of optimal implementations that turns synthesis into a query. Algorithmically, we combine meet-in-the-middle ideas with provable pruning rules and problem-specific arithmetic designed for modern hardware. The result is an exact, reusable synthesis engine with substantially improved practical performance.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Circuit Design & Gate Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Exact synthesis provides unconditional optimality and canonical structure, but is often limited to small, carefully scoped regimes.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3284

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.