Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Deriving the time-dependent Schrodinger m- and p-equations from the Klein-Gordon equation

arXiv
Authors: Paul Kinsler

Year

2013

Paper ID

32800

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

I present an alternative and rather direct way to derive the well known Schrödinger equation for a quantum wavefunction, by starting with the Klein Gordon equation and applying a directional factorization scheme. And since if you have a directionally factorizing hammer, everything looks like a factorizable nail, I also derive an alternative wavefunction propagation equation in the momentum-dominated limit. This new Schrödinger p-equation therefore provides a potentially useful complement to the traditional Schrödinger m-equation's mass-dominated limit.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • I present an alternative and rather direct way to derive the well known Schrödinger equation for a quantum wavefunction, by starting with the Klein Gordon equation and applying...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #32800 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69964 Bounded-depth spacetime lattice... #69945 Phase Stable Integrated Delay L...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.