Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
On 1/Z expansion for two-electron systems
arXiv
Authors: J. C. Lopez Vieyra, A. V. Turbiner
Year
2013
Paper ID
32779
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
119
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The 1/Z-expansion for the Coulomb system of infinitely massive center of charge Z and two electrons is discussed. Numerical deficiency in Baker et al, {\em Phys. Rev. \bf A41}, 1247 (1990) is indicated which continue to raise doubts in correctness of their calculations of the higher order coefficients in 1/Z-expansion expressed in Refs.[4-5]. It is shown that a minor modification of a few first coefficients found in Ref.[3] allows to calculate the ground state energies at Z\ =\ 1, 2,ldots \ 10 (as well as at Z > 10) with a portion of 15th decimal digit in comparison with highly accurate calculations by C. Schwartz and by Nakashima-Nakatsuji. Ground state energies of two-electron ions Z=11\ \(Na9+\) and Z=12\ \(Mg10+\) are found with 14 decimal digits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The 1/Z-expansion for the Coulomb system of infinitely massive center of charge Z and two electrons is discussed.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.